Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIOPX vs RGACX
BIOPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs RGACX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$52.44
Change+$0.49 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.71B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
BIOPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIOPX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOPX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. BIOPX (1.71B). RGACX pays higher dividends than BIOPX: RGACX (0.07) vs BIOPX (0.00). BIOPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BIOPX (26 years) vs RGACX (23 years). BIOPX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). BIOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: RGACX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.81 vs. RGACX (17.83). BIOPX return over 5 years is better than : 56.12 vs. RGACX (40.02).
| BIOPX | RGACX | BIOPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.94 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.94 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.267 | 15.516 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.71B | 332B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.81 | 17.83 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.82 | 58.53 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.12 | 40.02 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 191.66 | 95.93 | 200% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement