Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIOPX vs GFAFX
BIOPX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs GFAFX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$54.86
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
BIOPX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIOPX vs. GFAFX commentary
Dec 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOPX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. BIOPX (1.83B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BIOPX: GFAFX (0.28) vs BIOPX (0.00). BIOPX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BIOPX (26 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). BIOPX (1.31) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BIOPX (30.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: GFAFX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.17 vs. GFAFX (5.96). BIOPX return over 5 years is better than : 34.16 vs. GFAFX (22.55).
| BIOPX | GFAFX | BIOPX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.65 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.65 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.401 | 9.178 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 339B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.28 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.17 | 5.96 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 138.00 | 66.57 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.16 | 22.55 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 223.66 | 94.69 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement