Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIOPX vs GFAFX
BIOPX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs GFAFX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$53.18
Change-$1.43 (-2.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
BIOPX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIOPX vs. GFAFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOPX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. BIOPX (1.72B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BIOPX: GFAFX (0.28) vs BIOPX (0.00). BIOPX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BIOPX (26 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). BIOPX (1.31) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). BIOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: GFAFX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.51 vs. GFAFX (6.64). BIOPX return over 5 years is better than : 42.27 vs. GFAFX (37.02).
| BIOPX | GFAFX | BIOPX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.67 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.67 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.835 | 17.055 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 340B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.28 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.51 | 6.64 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 110.19 | 63.22 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.27 | 37.02 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 190.12 | 95.21 | 200% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement