Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIOPX vs GFAFX
BIOPX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs GFAFX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$51.72
Change-$3.32 (-6.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.81
Change-$9.47 (-10.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
BIOPX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIOPX vs. GFAFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOPX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. BIOPX (1.81B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BIOPX: GFAFX (0.22) vs BIOPX (0.00). BIOPX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BIOPX (26 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). BIOPX (1.31) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BIOPX (30.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: GFAFX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.53 vs. GFAFX (2.63). BIOPX return over 5 years is better than : 17.87 vs. GFAFX (13.21).
| BIOPX | GFAFX | BIOPX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.65 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.65 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.204 | -1.017 | 413% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 336B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.53 | 2.63 | 248% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.84 | 44.62 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.87 | 13.21 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 283.68 | 119.16 | 238% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement