Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIOPX vs FFAFX
BIOPX vs FFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs FFAFX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$52.66
Change+$0.35 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$84.20
Change+$0.28 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
BIOPX vs FFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. BIOPX (1.65B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than BIOPX: FFAFX (0.58) vs BIOPX (0.00). BIOPX was incepted earlier than FFAFX: BIOPX (25 years) vs FFAFX (5 years). BIOPX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). BIOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: FFAFX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.63 vs. FFAFX (18.10).
| BIOPX | FFAFX | BIOPX / FFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.35 | 374% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.35 | 374% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.733 | 13.477 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 328B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.63 | 18.10 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 102.38 | 60.41 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.09 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement