It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BIO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQIPT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BIO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QIPT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BIO (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -7.16% price change this week, while QIPT (@Medical Distributors) price change was -7.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.99%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was -1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.91%.
BIO is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
QIPT is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
@Medical Distributors (-1.44% weekly)Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.
BIO | QIPT | BIO / QIPT | |
Capitalization | 7.12B | 93M | 7,653% |
EBITDA | 656M | 49.2M | 1,333% |
Gain YTD | -19.573 | -30.164 | 65% |
P/E Ratio | 23.82 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.55B | 241M | 1,060% |
Total Cash | 1.37B | 17.1M | 8,035% |
Total Debt | 1.41B | 98.3M | 1,430% |
BIO | QIPT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BIO's Valuation (82) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as QIPT (94) in the null industry. This means that BIO’s stock grew similarly to QIPT’s over the last 12 months.
BIO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as QIPT (100) in the null industry. This means that BIO’s stock grew similarly to QIPT’s over the last 12 months.
BIO's SMR Rating (85) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as QIPT (94) in the null industry. This means that BIO’s stock grew similarly to QIPT’s over the last 12 months.
BIO's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as QIPT (61) in the null industry. This means that BIO’s stock grew similarly to QIPT’s over the last 12 months.
QIPT's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BIO (61) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that QIPT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BIO’s over the last 12 months.
BIO | QIPT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago54% | 4 days ago84% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | 4 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 4 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 4 days ago89% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago64% | 4 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago68% | 11 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago67% | 4 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% | 4 days ago72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BIO has been closely correlated with A. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BIO jumps, then A could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that QIPT and TMO have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QIPT and TMO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QIPT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QIPT | 100% | -0.47% | ||
TMO - QIPT | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
QDEL - QIPT | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
RVTY - QIPT | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.44% | ||
BIO - QIPT | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.40% | ||
AVNS - QIPT | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
More |