Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINSX vs RERFX
BINSX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts BINSX vs RERFX
Baillie Gifford International Alpha I
Price$14.08
Change+$0.07 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.1B
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$63.20
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
BINSX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINSX vs. RERFX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINSX is a Hold and RERFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. BINSX (2.1B). RERFX pays higher dividends than BINSX: RERFX (2.94) vs BINSX (0.77). BINSX was incepted earlier than RERFX: BINSX (9 years) vs RERFX (24 years). BINSX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). RERFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINSX (20.00). BINSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERFX: BINSX (0) vs RERFX (250). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.27 vs. BINSX (10.32). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.71 vs. BINSX (-13.91).
| BINSX | RERFX | BINSX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.52 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.52 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.924 | 4.480 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.1B | 135B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 2.94 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.32 | 20.27 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.80 | 28.18 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.91 | -2.71 | 513% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement