Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINIX vs RERCX
BINIX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts BINIX vs RERCX
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$33.70
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets326.48M
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$61.74
Change-$1.68 (-2.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
BINIX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINIX vs. RERCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINIX is a Hold and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. BINIX (326M). RERCX pays higher dividends than BINIX: RERCX (2.48) vs BINIX (1.11). BINIX was incepted earlier than RERCX: BINIX (17 years) vs RERCX (24 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than BINIX (1.04). RERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: RERCX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.98 vs. RERCX (17.63). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.16 vs. RERCX (-5.91).
| BINIX | RERCX | BINIX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.12 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.12 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.854 | 5.629 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 2.48 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.98 | 17.63 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.09 | 23.91 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.16 | -5.91 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.03 | 62.87 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers