Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINIX vs RERCX
BINIX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts BINIX vs RERCX
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$32.68
Change-$0.29 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets355.26M
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$63.79
Change-$1.10 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
BINIX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINIX vs. RERCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINIX is a Buy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. BINIX (355M). BINIX pays higher dividends than RERCX: BINIX (0.66) vs RERCX (0.46). BINIX was incepted earlier than RERCX: BINIX (16 years) vs RERCX (24 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than BINIX (1.04). RERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: RERCX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. RERCX (16.72). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 14.62 vs. RERCX (8.87).
| BINIX | RERCX | BINIX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.12 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.12 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.820 | 24.406 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 355M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.46 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | 16.72 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.77 | 35.83 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.62 | 8.87 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.23 | 46.07 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers