Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINIX vs RERBX
BINIX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts BINIX vs RERBX
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$32.68
Change-$0.29 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets355.26M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$61.89
Change-$1.07 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
BINIX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINIX vs. RERBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINIX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. BINIX (355M). BINIX pays higher dividends than RERBX: BINIX (0.66) vs RERBX (0.23). BINIX was incepted earlier than RERBX: BINIX (16 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than BINIX (1.04). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: RERBX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. RERBX (16.02). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 14.62 vs. RERBX (6.29).
| BINIX | RERBX | BINIX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.56 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.820 | 23.815 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 355M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.23 | 287% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | 16.02 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.77 | 33.99 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.62 | 6.29 | 232% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.23 | 41.87 | 213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers