Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINIX vs RERBX
BINIX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts BINIX vs RERBX
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$33.36
Change-$0.10 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets363.25M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$61.31
Change-$0.26 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.72B
BINIX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINIX vs. RERBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINIX is a StrongBuy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. BINIX (363M). BINIX pays higher dividends than RERBX: BINIX (0.66) vs RERBX (0.24). BINIX was incepted earlier than RERBX: BINIX (16 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than BINIX (1.04). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: RERBX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.68 vs. RERBX (9.91). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 23.57 vs. RERBX (9.57).
| BINIX | RERBX | BINIX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.56 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.285 | 20.570 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 363M | 138B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.24 | 276% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.68 | 9.91 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.08 | 45.47 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.57 | 9.57 | 246% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.38 | 35.83 | 244% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement