Advertisement
BINI vs CENN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINI is a Hold and CENN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BINI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCENN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BINI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CENN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BINI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CENN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BINI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CENN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BINI (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -37.66% price change this week, while CENN (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -2.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -4.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.32%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (-4.40% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
| BINI | CENN | BINI / CENN | |
| Capitalization | 863K | 26.8M | 3% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -29.48M | - |
| Gain YTD | -99.937 | -50.869 | 196% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 30.2M | - |
| Total Cash | 60.3M | 5.99M | 1,006% |
| Total Debt | 36M | 24.5M | 147% |
BINI | CENN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 6 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BINI's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CENN (54) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that BINI’s stock grew similarly to CENN’s over the last 12 months.
BINI's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CENN (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that BINI’s stock grew similarly to CENN’s over the last 12 months.
CENN's SMR Rating (97) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as BINI (100) in the null industry. This means that CENN’s stock grew similarly to BINI’s over the last 12 months.
CENN's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BINI (99) in the null industry. This means that CENN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BINI’s over the last 12 months.
CENN's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as BINI (100) in the null industry. This means that CENN’s stock grew similarly to BINI’s over the last 12 months.
| BINI | CENN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
BINI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BINI and TSLA have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BINI and TSLA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BINI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BINI | 100% | -8.95% | ||
| TSLA - BINI | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.44% | ||
| SVUHF - BINI | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.69% | ||
| CENN - BINI | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.96% | ||
| WKHS - BINI | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
| SBLX - BINI | 13% Poorly correlated | -3.03% | ||
More | ||||
CENN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CENN and STLA have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CENN and STLA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CENN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENN | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| STLA - CENN | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.87% | ||
| F - CENN | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
| TM - CENN | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| GM - CENN | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.33% | ||
| XPEV - CENN | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.60% | ||
More | ||||