Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINC vs CRDT
BINC vs CRDT Comparison
Open Charts BINC vs CRDT
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
Price$52.88
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Volume$2.34K
Net Assets16.42B
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF
Price$23.03
Change-$0.07 (-0.30%)
Volume$25K
Net Assets38.72M
BINC vs CRDT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINC vs. CRDT commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINC is a Buy and CRDT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BINC has more net assets: 16.4B vs. CRDT (38.7M). BINC has a higher annual dividend yield than CRDT: BINC (0.612) vs CRDT (-0.396). BINC was incepted earlier than CRDT: BINC (3 years) vs CRDT (3 years). BINC (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than CRDT (0.99). CRDT has a higher turnover BINC (291.00) vs BINC (291.00).
| BINC | CRDT | BINC / CRDT | |
| Gain YTD | 0.612 | -0.396 | -154% |
| Net Assets | 16.4B | 38.7M | 42,377% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.99 | 40% |
| Turnover | 291.00 | 418.00 | 70% |
| Yield | 5.56 | 6.97 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BINC | CRDT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 3% | 2 days ago 33% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 9% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 38% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 28% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 15% | 2 days ago 36% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 46% | 8 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 14% | 3 days ago 36% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CRDT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRDT and QVCGP have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRDT and QVCGP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRDT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRDT | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| QVCGP - CRDT | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.60% | ||
| LUMN - CRDT | 20% Poorly correlated | -5.26% | ||
| FRO - CRDT | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.98% | ||
| QVCGA - CRDT | 7% Poorly correlated | -5.70% | ||
| OCSL - CRDT | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.82% | ||
More | ||||