Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINC vs CRDT
BINC vs CRDT Comparison
Open Charts BINC vs CRDT
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
Price$52.76
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Volume$1.15M
Net Assets15.04B
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF
Price$23.22
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
Volume$2.44K
Net Assets58.76M
BINC vs CRDT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINC vs. CRDT commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINC is a Buy and CRDT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BINC has more net assets: 15B vs. CRDT (58.8M). BINC has a higher annual dividend yield than CRDT: BINC (5.965) vs CRDT (-2.178). BINC was incepted earlier than CRDT: BINC (3 years) vs CRDT (3 years). BINC (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than CRDT (0.99). CRDT has a higher turnover BINC (291.00) vs BINC (291.00).
| BINC | CRDT | BINC / CRDT | |
| Gain YTD | 5.965 | -2.178 | -274% |
| Net Assets | 15B | 58.8M | 25,510% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.99 | 40% |
| Turnover | 291.00 | 418.00 | 70% |
| Yield | 5.87 | 7.04 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BINC | CRDT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 9% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 33% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 20% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 16% | 2 days ago 37% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 13% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 9 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 15% | 5 days ago 37% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CRDT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRDT and QVCGP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRDT and QVCGP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRDT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRDT | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| QVCGP - CRDT | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.79% | ||
| LUMN - CRDT | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
| QVCGA - CRDT | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.42% | ||
| FRO - CRDT | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.77% | ||
| OCSL - CRDT | -2% Poorly correlated | +0.71% | ||
More | ||||