Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINC vs CGMS
BINC vs CGMS Comparison
Open Charts BINC vs CGMS
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
Price$52.75
Change+$0.09 (+0.17%)
Volume$1.28M
Net Assets15.03B
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Inc ETF
Price$27.66
Change-$0.11 (-0.40%)
Volume$494.71K
Net Assets3.9B
BINC vs CGMS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINC vs. CGMS commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINC is a Buy and CGMS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BINC has more net assets: 15B vs. CGMS (3.9B). CGMS has a higher annual dividend yield than BINC: CGMS (6.543) vs BINC (5.945). BINC was incepted earlier than CGMS: BINC (3 years) vs CGMS (3 years). CGMS (0.39) and BINC (0.40) have comparable expense ratios . BINC has a higher turnover CGMS (39.00) vs CGMS (39.00).
| BINC | CGMS | BINC / CGMS | |
| Gain YTD | 5.945 | 6.543 | 91% |
| Net Assets | 15B | 3.9B | 385% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.39 | 103% |
| Turnover | 291.00 | 39.00 | 746% |
| Yield | 5.87 | 6.00 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BINC | CGMS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 9% | 2 days ago 28% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 27% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 17% | 2 days ago 40% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% | 2 days ago 37% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 16% | 2 days ago 33% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 13% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 15% | 17 days ago 34% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 29% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RSPR | 33.69 | 0.41 | +1.23% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Real Estt ETF | |||
| SPHD | 48.18 | 0.34 | +0.71% |
| Invesco S&P 500® High Div Low Vol ETF | |||
| BDVG | 13.02 | 0.07 | +0.55% |
| iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF | |||
| GJUL | 41.43 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Jul | |||
| JPY | 32.05 | -0.06 | -0.20% |
| Lazard Japanese Equity ETF | |||
CGMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGMS has been loosely correlated with DBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGMS jumps, then DBD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGMS | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| DBD - CGMS | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| NFE - CGMS | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.71% |