Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIMBX vs FSMMX
BIMBX vs FSMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIMBX vs. FSMMX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIMBX is a Hold and FSMMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.76B vs. FSMMX (1.76B). BIMBX pays higher dividends than FSMMX: BIMBX (3.93) vs FSMMX (2.08). BIMBX was incepted earlier than FSMMX: BIMBX (10 years) vs FSMMX (8 years). FSMMX (1.97) is less costly to investors than BIMBX (0.93). FSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 987.00 vs. BIMBX (242.00). FSMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIMBX: FSMMX (2500) vs BIMBX (2000000). BIMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.18 vs. FSMMX (1.55). FSMMX return over 5 years is better than : 27.25 vs. BIMBX (15.29).
| BIMBX | FSMMX | BIMBX / FSMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.97 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.97 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.881 | 1.444 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 2500 | 80,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.76B | 1.76B | 440% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.93 | 2.08 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.18 | 1.55 | 270% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.51 | 11.25 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.29 | 27.25 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement