Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIMBX vs FSLTX
BIMBX vs FSLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIMBX has more cash in the bank: 8.03B vs. FSLTX (2.59B). BIMBX (3.95) and FSLTX (3.91) have matching dividends . BIMBX was incepted earlier than FSLTX: BIMBX (10 years) vs FSLTX (3 years). FSLTX (1.81) is less costly to investors than BIMBX (0.93). BIMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. FSLTX (109.00). FSLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIMBX: FSLTX (0) vs BIMBX (2000000). FSLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.73 vs. BIMBX (1.36).
| BIMBX | FSLTX | BIMBX / FSLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.56 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.81 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.564 | 6.341 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.03B | 2.59B | 311% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.95 | 3.91 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.36 | 7.73 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.80 | 12.11 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.33 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers