Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIMBX vs DMSFX
BIMBX vs DMSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIMBX vs. DMSFX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIMBX is a Hold and DMSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.76B vs. DMSFX (529M). DMSFX pays higher dividends than BIMBX: DMSFX (6.09) vs BIMBX (3.95). BIMBX was incepted earlier than DMSFX: BIMBX (10 years) vs DMSFX (8 years). DMSFX (1.80) is less costly to investors than BIMBX (0.93). BIMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. DMSFX (58.00). DMSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIMBX: DMSFX (0) vs BIMBX (2000000). BIMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.23 vs. DMSFX (4.43). DMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.95 vs. BIMBX (18.23).
| BIMBX | DMSFX | BIMBX / DMSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.37 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.80 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.673 | 0.634 | 422% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.76B | 529M | 1,466% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.95 | 6.09 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.23 | 4.43 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.58 | 22.85 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.23 | 30.95 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement