Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BILPX vs EMACX
BILPX vs EMACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BILPX vs. EMACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BILPX is a Hold and EMACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BILPX has more cash in the bank: 4.88B vs. EMACX (51M). BILPX pays higher dividends than EMACX: BILPX (4.19) vs EMACX (0.00). BILPX was incepted earlier than EMACX: BILPX (18 years) vs EMACX (25 years). EMACX (2.62) is less costly to investors than BILPX (1.37). EMACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 125.00 vs. BILPX (81.00). EMACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BILPX: EMACX (1000) vs BILPX (2000000). EMACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.73 vs. BILPX (5.45). BILPX (15.47) and EMACX (14.73) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BILPX | EMACX | BILPX / EMACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 2.62 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 2.62 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.710 | 13.013 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.88B | 51M | 9,563% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.45 | 8.73 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.79 | 23.11 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.47 | 14.73 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.58 | 17.56 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement