It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BILI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSOHU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BILI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOHU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BILI (@Packaged Software) experienced а -22.96% price change this week, while SOHU (@Packaged Software) price change was -12.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.
BILI is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
SOHU is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
BILI | SOHU | BILI / SOHU | |
Capitalization | 4.65B | 356M | 1,307% |
EBITDA | -1.67B | 24.6M | -6,782% |
Gain YTD | 52.753 | 27.291 | 193% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 15.20 | - |
Revenue | 22.5B | 601M | 3,744% |
Total Cash | 15B | 960M | 1,563% |
Total Debt | 7.65B | 35.3M | 21,657% |
BILI | SOHU | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BILI's Valuation (36) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as SOHU (39). This means that BILI’s stock grew similarly to SOHU’s over the last 12 months.
SOHU's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as BILI (95). This means that SOHU’s stock grew similarly to BILI’s over the last 12 months.
SOHU's SMR Rating (90) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as BILI (96). This means that SOHU’s stock grew similarly to BILI’s over the last 12 months.
BILI's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as SOHU (62). This means that BILI’s stock grew similarly to SOHU’s over the last 12 months.
SOHU's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for BILI (100). This means that SOHU’s stock grew significantly faster than BILI’s over the last 12 months.
BILI | SOHU | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago87% | 1 day ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago77% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BILI has been loosely correlated with YMM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BILI jumps, then YMM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BILI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BILI | 100% | -12.60% | ||
YMM - BILI | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
KC - BILI | 54% Loosely correlated | +4.49% | ||
YALA - BILI | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.56% | ||
API - BILI | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
SKLZ - BILI | 33% Loosely correlated | -2.85% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOHU has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOHU jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOHU | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SOHU | 100% | +3.86% | ||
BILI - SOHU | 36% Loosely correlated | -12.60% | ||
YMM - SOHU | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
NTES - SOHU | 31% Poorly correlated | +10.41% | ||
KC - SOHU | 27% Poorly correlated | +4.49% | ||
ISDCF - SOHU | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |