Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIICX vs FMUFX
BIICX vs FMUFX Comparison
Open Charts BIICX vs FMUFX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Instl
Price$10.69
Change+$0.11 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.66B
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv F
Price$16.11
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.42B
BIICX vs FMUFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIICX vs. FMUFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIICX is a Hold and FMUFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIICX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. FMUFX (1.42B). BIICX pays higher dividends than FMUFX: BIICX (5.83) vs FMUFX (1.67). BIICX was incepted earlier than FMUFX: BIICX (18 years) vs FMUFX (19 years). FMUFX (1.09) is less costly to investors than BIICX (0.68). BIICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FMUFX (31.00). FMUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIICX: FMUFX (1500) vs BIICX (2000000). BIICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.39 vs. FMUFX (9.41). FMUFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.51 vs. BIICX (23.89).
| BIICX | FMUFX | BIICX / FMUFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.99 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.09 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.608 | 1.794 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | 1% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1500 | 133,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 1.42B | 752% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.83 | 1.67 | 349% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.39 | 9.41 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.21 | 28.07 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.89 | 25.51 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.24 | 61.40 | 123% |