It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BIIB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNVS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BIIB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BIIB (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -3.63% price change this week, while NVS (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -1.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -1.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.36%.
BIIB is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
NVS is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.
The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
BIIB | NVS | BIIB / NVS | |
Capitalization | 31.3B | 198B | 16% |
EBITDA | 2.04B | 18.3B | 11% |
Gain YTD | -41.786 | 1.898 | -2,202% |
P/E Ratio | 26.95 | 23.38 | 115% |
Revenue | 9.84B | 46.7B | 21% |
Total Cash | 1.05B | 14B | 8% |
Total Debt | 7.34B | 26.3B | 28% |
BIIB | NVS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NVS's Valuation (13) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for BIIB (85) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew significantly faster than BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
NVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for BIIB (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew significantly faster than BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
NVS's SMR Rating (22) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BIIB (69) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
NVS's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as BIIB (65) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew similarly to BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
NVS's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as BIIB (96) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew similarly to BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
BIIB | NVS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 3 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 3 days ago50% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 3 days ago42% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 3 days ago45% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 3 days ago44% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 3 days ago39% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago68% | 3 days ago45% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 3 days ago60% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 3 days ago29% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BIIB and OGN have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BIIB and OGN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BIIB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BIIB | 100% | +0.10% | ||
OGN - BIIB | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.30% | ||
PFE - BIIB | 31% Poorly correlated | +4.67% | ||
NVS - BIIB | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
AZN - BIIB | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.43% | ||
JNJ - BIIB | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.78% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVS has been loosely correlated with SNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NVS jumps, then SNY could also see price increases.