Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIEMX vs RNWBX
BIEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts BIEMX vs RNWBX
William Blair Emerging Mkts Growth R6
Price$16.10
Change+$0.09 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
BIEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIEMX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. BIEMX (1.01B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than BIEMX: RNWBX (0.12) vs BIEMX (0.11). BIEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: BIEMX (21 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than BIEMX (1.06). BIEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIEMX: RNWBX (250) vs BIEMX (1000000). BIEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.62 vs. RNWBX (19.18). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.90 vs. BIEMX (-11.06).
| BIEMX | RNWBX | BIEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.67 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.67 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.037 | 20.884 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 75.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.12 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.62 | 19.18 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.13 | 41.02 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.06 | 7.90 | -140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.65 | 82.81 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement