Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIEMX vs RNWBX
BIEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts BIEMX vs RNWBX
William Blair Emerging Mkts Growth R6
Price$17.83
Change+$1.77 (+11.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
BIEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIEMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. BIEMX (1.12B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than BIEMX: RNWBX (0.45) vs BIEMX (0.41). BIEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: BIEMX (21 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BIEMX (1.06). BIEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIEMX: RNWBX (250) vs BIEMX (1000000). BIEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.50 vs. RNWBX (26.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. BIEMX (-13.10).
| BIEMX | RNWBX | BIEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.66 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.66 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.198 | 5.996 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.45 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.50 | 26.27 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.10 | 38.81 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.10 | 7.03 | -186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.78 | 114.19 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement