Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIECX vs TRIGX
BIECX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts BIECX vs TRIGX
Brandes International Equity C
Price$24.87
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.75B
BIECX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIECX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIECX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. BIECX (1.67B). TRIGX pays higher dividends than BIECX: TRIGX (2.04) vs BIECX (1.90). BIECX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: BIECX (12 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). BIECX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). BIECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.26 vs. TRIGX (15.90). BIECX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.12 vs. BIECX (23.57). BIECX return over 5 years is better than : 112.54 vs. TRIGX (99.95).
| BIECX | TRIGX | BIECX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.648 | 26.780 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 15.8B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 2.04 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.57 | 25.12 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.68 | 72.07 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 112.54 | 99.95 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.19 | 78.90 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement