Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIECX vs TRIGX
BIECX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts BIECX vs TRIGX
Brandes International Equity C
Price$25.22
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.92
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.98B
BIECX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIECX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIECX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. BIECX (1.74B). TRIGX pays higher dividends than BIECX: TRIGX (2.04) vs BIECX (1.90). BIECX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: BIECX (12 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). BIECX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). BIECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.03 vs. TRIGX (15.90). BIECX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.40 vs. BIECX (23.33). BIECX return over 5 years is better than : 109.46 vs. TRIGX (99.97).
| BIECX | TRIGX | BIECX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.388 | 29.017 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 16B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 2.04 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.33 | 27.40 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.72 | 76.27 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.46 | 99.97 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.57 | 79.09 | 111% |