Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIECX vs HFQRX
BIECX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts BIECX vs HFQRX
Brandes International Equity C
Price$26.12
Change+$0.14 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.06
Change+$0.03 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
BIECX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIECX vs. HFQRX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIECX is a Buy and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.62B vs. BIECX (1.92B). HFQRX pays higher dividends than BIECX: HFQRX (7.21) vs BIECX (1.82). BIECX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: BIECX (13 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). BIECX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. BIECX (17.03). BIECX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: BIECX (2500) vs HFQRX (1000000). BIECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.00 vs. HFQRX (16.38). BIECX return over 5 years is better than : 123.91 vs. HFQRX (76.78).
| BIECX | HFQRX | BIECX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.70 | 256% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.70 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.863 | 21.813 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 6.62B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 7.21 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.00 | 16.38 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 117.29 | 67.71 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 123.91 | 76.78 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement