BICEF
Price
$59.85
Change
-$1.18 (-1.93%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.56B
DQWS
Price
$0.03
Change
+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
6.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BICEF vs DQWS

Header iconBICEF vs DQWS Comparison
Open Charts BICEF vs DQWSBanner chart's image
Bic Stec
Price$59.85
Change-$1.18 (-1.93%)
Volume$250
Capitalization2.56B
Dswiss
Price$0.03
Change+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Volume$224
Capitalization6.41M
BICEF vs DQWS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BICEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DQWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BICEF vs. DQWS commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BICEF is a Hold and DQWS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BICEF: $59.85 vs. DQWS: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: BICEF and DQWS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BICEF: 83% vs. DQWS: 85%
Market capitalization -- BICEF: $2.57B vs. DQWS: $6.41M
BICEF [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $2.57B. DQWS’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $6.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $372.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $22.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BICEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDQWS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BICEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DQWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BICEF is a better buy in the long-term than DQWS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BICEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DQWS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BICEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DQWS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BICEF is a better buy in the short-term than DQWS.

Price Growth

BICEF (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DQWS (@Household/Personal Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.74% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BICEF($2.56B) has a higher market cap than DQWS($6.41M). DQWS has higher P/E ratio than BICEF: DQWS (880.00) vs BICEF (12.13). DQWS YTD gains are higher at: 69.399 vs. BICEF (-9.729). BICEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 384M vs. DQWS (46K). BICEF has more cash in the bank: 313M vs. DQWS (581K). DQWS has less debt than BICEF: DQWS (257K) vs BICEF (365M). BICEF has higher revenues than DQWS: BICEF (2.13B) vs DQWS (4.09M).
BICEFDQWSBICEF / DQWS
Capitalization2.56B6.41M39,850%
EBITDA384M46K834,783%
Gain YTD-9.72969.399-14%
P/E Ratio12.13880.001%
Revenue2.13B4.09M52,240%
Total Cash313M581K53,873%
Total Debt365M257K142,023%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BICEF vs DQWS: Fundamental Ratings
BICEF
DQWS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89100
SMR RATING
1..100
7093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7765
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
411
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BICEF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DQWS (97). This means that BICEF’s stock grew significantly faster than DQWS’s over the last 12 months.

BICEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as DQWS (100). This means that BICEF’s stock grew similarly to DQWS’s over the last 12 months.

BICEF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as DQWS (93). This means that BICEF’s stock grew similarly to DQWS’s over the last 12 months.

DQWS's Price Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as BICEF (77). This means that DQWS’s stock grew similarly to BICEF’s over the last 12 months.

DQWS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BICEF (41). This means that DQWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BICEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BICEFDQWS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
17%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BICEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DQWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTOG0.330.01
+3.13%
Bit Origin Limited
OVLY29.520.37
+1.27%
Oak Valley Bancorp (CA)
EVH9.610.12
+1.26%
Evolent Health
HWC62.72-0.36
-0.57%
Hancock Whitney Corp
PNC204.40-2.96
-1.43%
PNC Financial Services Group

BICEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BICEF and KAOCF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BICEF and KAOCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BICEF
1D Price
Change %
BICEF100%
N/A
KAOCF - BICEF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDRFF - BICEF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
ETTYF - BICEF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAWW - BICEF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BICEY - BICEF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
More

DQWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DQWS and ETTYF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DQWS and ETTYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DQWS
1D Price
Change %
DQWS100%
N/A
ETTYF - DQWS
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HENKY - DQWS
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
BICEY - DQWS
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
HEGIY - DQWS
-2%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
BICEF - DQWS
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More