Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIBDX vs NQGCX
BIBDX vs NQGCX Comparison
Open Charts BIBDX vs NQGCX
BlackRock Global Dividend Instl
Price$13.02
Change+$0.14 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
Price$40.94
Change+$0.29 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.01M
BIBDX vs NQGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIBDX vs. NQGCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIBDX is a Hold and NQGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIBDX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. NQGCX (147M). BIBDX pays higher dividends than NQGCX: BIBDX (1.24) vs NQGCX (1.17). BIBDX was incepted earlier than NQGCX: BIBDX (17 years) vs NQGCX (16 years). NQGCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than BIBDX (0.80). BIBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NQGCX (27.00). NQGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIBDX: NQGCX (2500) vs BIBDX (2000000). NQGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.64 vs. BIBDX (1.61). NQGCX return over 5 years is better than : 84.63 vs. BIBDX (17.29).
| BIBDX | NQGCX | BIBDX / NQGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.86 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 2.02 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.409 | 19.106 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 2500 | 80,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 147M | 707% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.17 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.61 | 19.64 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.48 | 61.48 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.29 | 84.63 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.92 | 86.11 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement