Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIBDX vs NQGCX
BIBDX vs NQGCX Comparison
Open Charts BIBDX vs NQGCX
BlackRock Global Dividend Instl
Price$11.88
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets890.34M
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
Price$43.20
Change+$0.05 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.18M
BIBDX vs NQGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIBDX vs. NQGCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIBDX is a Hold and NQGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIBDX has more cash in the bank: 890M vs. NQGCX (153M). NQGCX (1.21) and BIBDX (1.19) have matching dividends . BIBDX was incepted earlier than NQGCX: BIBDX (18 years) vs NQGCX (16 years). NQGCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than BIBDX (0.80). BIBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NQGCX (30.00). NQGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIBDX: NQGCX (2500) vs BIBDX (2000000). NQGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.33 vs. BIBDX (-1.08). NQGCX return over 5 years is better than : 75.90 vs. BIBDX (2.04).
| BIBDX | NQGCX | BIBDX / NQGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.86 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.99 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.494 | 26.639 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 2500 | 80,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 890M | 153M | 582% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.21 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.08 | 25.33 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.78 | 59.02 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.04 | 75.90 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.16 | 96.11 | 23% |