Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIBDX vs NQGCX
BIBDX vs NQGCX Comparison
Open Charts BIBDX vs NQGCX
BlackRock Global Dividend Instl
Price$12.22
Change-$1.12 (-8.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets917.5M
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
Price$45.37
Change+$4.12 (+9.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.94M
BIBDX vs NQGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIBDX vs. NQGCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIBDX is a Buy and NQGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIBDX has more cash in the bank: 917M vs. NQGCX (161M). BIBDX (1.34) and NQGCX (1.32) have matching dividends . BIBDX was incepted earlier than NQGCX: BIBDX (18 years) vs NQGCX (16 years). NQGCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than BIBDX (0.80). BIBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NQGCX (30.00). NQGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIBDX: NQGCX (2500) vs BIBDX (2000000). NQGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.83 vs. BIBDX (-0.36). NQGCX return over 5 years is better than : 78.34 vs. BIBDX (3.69).
| BIBDX | NQGCX | BIBDX / NQGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.86 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.99 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.384 | 5.684 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 2500 | 80,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 917M | 161M | 570% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.32 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.36 | 29.83 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.78 | 60.62 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.69 | 78.34 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.21 | 127.29 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement