Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIBDX vs FMIEX
BIBDX vs FMIEX Comparison
Open Charts BIBDX vs FMIEX
BlackRock Global Dividend Instl
Price$13.25
Change-$0.11 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
Wasatch Global Value Investor
Price$10.96
Change-$0.03 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets140.41M
BIBDX vs FMIEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIBDX vs. FMIEX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIBDX is a Hold and FMIEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIBDX has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. FMIEX (140M). FMIEX pays higher dividends than BIBDX: FMIEX (2.38) vs BIBDX (1.24). BIBDX was incepted earlier than FMIEX: BIBDX (17 years) vs FMIEX (29 years). FMIEX (1.18) is less costly to investors than BIBDX (0.80). BIBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FMIEX (25.00). FMIEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIBDX: FMIEX (2000) vs BIBDX (2000000). FMIEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.98 vs. BIBDX (2.06). FMIEX return over 5 years is better than : 93.04 vs. BIBDX (22.74).
| BIBDX | FMIEX | BIBDX / FMIEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.11 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.18 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.699 | 24.009 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 2000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 140M | 763% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 2.38 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.06 | 10.98 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.14 | 47.38 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.74 | 93.04 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.70 | 55.13 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement