Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIAWX vs GFACX
BIAWX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BIAWX vs GFACX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth I
Price$56.54
Change+$0.26 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.17B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
BIAWX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAWX vs. GFACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAWX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. BIAWX (8.17B). BIAWX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BIAWX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BIAWX (13 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BIAWX (0.76). BIAWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). BIAWX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: BIAWX (100) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. BIAWX (1.11). BIAWX return over 5 years is better than : 55.42 vs. GFACX (30.67).
| BIAWX | GFACX | BIAWX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.36 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.36 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.820 | 17.268 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.17B | 337B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.11 | 9.41 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.93 | 64.76 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.42 | 30.67 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 245.81 | 80.65 | 305% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement