Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIAWX vs FFAFX
BIAWX vs FFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BIAWX vs FFAFX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth I
Price$56.21
Change+$0.28 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.36
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
BIAWX vs FFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. BIAWX (7.4B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than BIAWX: FFAFX (0.54) vs BIAWX (0.00). BIAWX was incepted earlier than FFAFX: BIAWX (13 years) vs FFAFX (5 years). BIAWX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). BIAWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). BIAWX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: BIAWX (100) vs FFAFX (250). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.34 vs. BIAWX (-3.72). BIAWX return over 5 years is better than : 50.09 vs. FFAFX (34.69).
| BIAWX | FFAFX | BIAWX / FFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.35 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.35 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.152 | 19.205 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.4B | 339B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.72 | 7.34 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.87 | 63.71 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.09 | 34.69 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 233.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement