Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIAWX vs CGFAX
BIAWX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BIAWX vs CGFAX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth I
Price$56.33
Change+$0.20 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.38B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$85.15
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
BIAWX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAWX vs. CGFAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAWX is a Buy and CGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. BIAWX (8.38B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BIAWX: CGFAX (0.32) vs BIAWX (0.00). BIAWX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BIAWX (13 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). BIAWX (0.76) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). BIAWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). BIAWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: BIAWX (100) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. BIAWX (6.32). BIAWX return over 5 years is better than : 64.62 vs. CGFAX (42.66).
| BIAWX | CGFAX | BIAWX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.65 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.65 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.615 | 15.760 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.38B | 332B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.32 | 18.35 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.76 | 60.35 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.62 | 42.66 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 255.08 | 105.34 | 242% |