Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIASX vs WCMLX
BIASX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BIASX vs WCMLX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth I
Price$22.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets797.02M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.79
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.97M
BIASX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIASX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIASX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIASX has more cash in the bank: 797M vs. WCMLX (43M). BIASX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BIASX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BIASX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BIASX (1.12). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BIASX (28.00). BIASX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BIASX (100) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.70 vs. BIASX (-6.72). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.48 vs. BIASX (-11.32).
| BIASX | WCMLX | BIASX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.99 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.79 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.581 | 7.232 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 797M | 43M | 1,853% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.72 | 1.70 | -396% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.29 | 33.88 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.32 | 12.48 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement