Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIASX vs WCMLX
BIASX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BIASX vs WCMLX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth I
Price$19.87
Change-$2.57 (-11.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets627.64M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
BIASX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIASX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIASX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIASX has more cash in the bank: 628M vs. WCMLX (47.1M). BIASX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BIASX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BIASX (27 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BIASX (1.11). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BIASX (28.00). BIASX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BIASX (100) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. BIASX (-14.24). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. BIASX (-34.05).
| BIASX | WCMLX | BIASX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.99 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.79 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.760 | 6.395 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 628M | 47.1M | 1,333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.24 | 8.52 | -167% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.43 | 19.51 | -48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.05 | -5.30 | 642% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement