Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIALX vs NPFCX
BIALX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts BIALX vs NPFCX
Brown Advisory Global Leaders Investor
Price$30.09
Change-$0.22 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.59B
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$68.84
Change-$0.24 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
BIALX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIALX vs. NPFCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIALX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. BIALX (2.59B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than BIALX: NPFCX (0.34) vs BIALX (0.32). BIALX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: BIALX (11 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than BIALX (0.91). NPFCX (23.00) and BIALX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. BIALX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: BIALX (100) vs NPFCX (250). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.92 vs. BIALX (4.67). BIALX return over 5 years is better than : 42.10 vs. NPFCX (13.86).
| BIALX | NPFCX | BIALX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.47 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.47 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.378 | 2.809 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.34 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.67 | 11.92 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.49 | 38.78 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.10 | 13.86 | 304% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.04 | 117.38 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers