Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIAGX vs GFAFX
BIAGX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BIAGX vs GFAFX
Brown Advisory Growth Equity I
Price$8.37
Change-$9.32 (-52.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.86M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.81
Change-$9.47 (-10.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
BIAGX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAGX vs. GFAFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAGX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. BIAGX (339M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BIAGX: GFAFX (0.22) vs BIAGX (0.00). BIAGX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BIAGX (27 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). BIAGX (0.86) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BIAGX (27.00). BIAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: BIAGX (100) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.63 vs. BIAGX (-50.88). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.21 vs. BIAGX (-74.70).
| BIAGX | GFAFX | BIAGX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.65 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.65 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.000 | -1.017 | 688% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -50.88 | 2.63 | -1,935% |
| Returns for 3 years | -64.64 | 44.62 | -145% |
| Returns for 5 years | -74.70 | 13.21 | -565% |
| Returns for 10 years | -51.25 | 119.16 | -43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers