Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIAGX vs GFACX
BIAGX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BIAGX vs GFACX
Brown Advisory Growth Equity I
Price$17.32
Change+$0.10 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets529.77M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
BIAGX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAGX vs. GFACX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAGX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. BIAGX (530M). BIAGX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BIAGX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BIAGX (26 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BIAGX (0.84). BIAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). BIAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: BIAGX (100) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. BIAGX (-43.64). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. BIAGX (-47.52).
| BIAGX | GFACX | BIAGX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.36 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.36 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.843 | 17.268 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 530M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -43.64 | 9.41 | -464% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.20 | 64.76 | -33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -47.52 | 30.67 | -155% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.31 | 80.65 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement