Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIAGX vs GFACX
BIAGX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BIAGX vs GFACX
Brown Advisory Growth Equity I
Price$9.11
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets401M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$68.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
BIAGX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAGX vs. GFACX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAGX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. BIAGX (401M). BIAGX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BIAGX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BIAGX (27 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than BIAGX (0.86). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BIAGX (27.00). BIAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: BIAGX (100) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.61 vs. BIAGX (-46.35). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 12.81 vs. BIAGX (-71.82).
| BIAGX | GFACX | BIAGX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.35 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.35 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -44.855 | 6.760 | -664% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 401M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -46.35 | 3.61 | -1,285% |
| Returns for 3 years | -56.54 | 57.24 | -99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -71.82 | 12.81 | -561% |
| Returns for 10 years | -53.76 | 72.42 | -74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement