Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIAGX vs CGFAX
BIAGX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BIAGX vs CGFAX
Brown Advisory Growth Equity I
Price$8.37
Change-$9.32 (-52.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.86M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$78.09
Change-$9.48 (-10.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
BIAGX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAGX vs. CGFAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAGX is a Hold and CGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. BIAGX (339M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BIAGX: CGFAX (0.25) vs BIAGX (0.00). BIAGX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BIAGX (27 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). BIAGX (0.86) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BIAGX (27.00). BIAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: BIAGX (100) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.57 vs. BIAGX (-50.88). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.28 vs. BIAGX (-74.70).
| BIAGX | CGFAX | BIAGX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.000 | -1.014 | 690% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -50.88 | 2.57 | -1,982% |
| Returns for 3 years | -64.64 | 44.42 | -146% |
| Returns for 5 years | -74.70 | 13.28 | -562% |
| Returns for 10 years | -51.25 | 123.98 | -41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers