BHSIF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
9.14M
LMSQF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
16.18M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHSIF vs LMSQF

Header iconBHSIF vs LMSQF Comparison
Open Charts BHSIF vs LMSQFBanner chart's image
Bayhorse Silver
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$179.22K
Capitalization9.14M
Latin Metals
Price$0.14
Change-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Volume$28.5K
Capitalization16.18M
BHSIF vs LMSQF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHSIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHSIF vs. LMSQF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHSIF is a Hold and LMSQF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BHSIF: $0.03 vs. LMSQF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: BHSIF and LMSQF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHSIF: 69% vs. LMSQF: 90%
Market capitalization -- BHSIF: $9.14M vs. LMSQF: $16.18M
BHSIF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $9.14M. LMSQF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $16.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHSIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMSQF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BHSIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LMSQF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LMSQF is a better buy in the long-term than BHSIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHSIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMSQF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHSIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LMSQF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LMSQF is a better buy in the short-term than BHSIF.

Price Growth

BHSIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.25% price change this week, while LMSQF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -0.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LMSQF($16.2M) has a higher market cap than BHSIF($9.14M). LMSQF YTD gains are higher at: 134.058 vs. BHSIF (-45.931). LMSQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2M vs. BHSIF (-2.44M). LMSQF (187K) and BHSIF (182K) have equal amount of cash in the bank . BHSIF (0) and LMSQF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BHSIFLMSQFBHSIF / LMSQF
Capitalization9.14M16.2M56%
EBITDA-2.44M-2M122%
Gain YTD-45.931134.058-34%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash182K187K97%
Total Debt409KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHSIF vs LMSQF: Fundamental Ratings
BHSIF
LMSQF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10077
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LMSQF's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as BHSIF (94). This means that LMSQF’s stock grew similarly to BHSIF’s over the last 12 months.

LMSQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as BHSIF (100). This means that LMSQF’s stock grew similarly to BHSIF’s over the last 12 months.

LMSQF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as BHSIF (100). This means that LMSQF’s stock grew similarly to BHSIF’s over the last 12 months.

LMSQF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as BHSIF (61). This means that LMSQF’s stock grew similarly to BHSIF’s over the last 12 months.

LMSQF's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as BHSIF (100). This means that LMSQF’s stock grew similarly to BHSIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHSIFLMSQF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHSIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EHMEF126.930.56
+0.44%
GOEASY LTD
KAKKF13.73N/A
N/A
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.
YNVYF0.13N/A
N/A
Ynvisible Interactive Inc.
DLMI4.94N/A
N/A
Diamond Lake Minerals, Inc.
PHYUF11.22N/A
N/A
Pyrophyte Acquisition Corp.

BHSIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BHSIF and LITOF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHSIF and LITOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHSIF
1D Price
Change %
BHSIF100%
+6.79%
LITOF - BHSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.43%
KCCFF - BHSIF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
LLKKF - BHSIF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
LEMIF - BHSIF
2%
Poorly correlated
-7.74%
LMSQF - BHSIF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.41%
More

LMSQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LMSQF and TKRFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LMSQF and TKRFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMSQF
1D Price
Change %
LMSQF100%
-3.41%
TKRFF - LMSQF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.86%
BHSIF - LMSQF
2%
Poorly correlated
+6.79%
LEMIF - LMSQF
2%
Poorly correlated
-7.74%
LLKKF - LMSQF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
KCCFF - LMSQF
-6%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
More