BHRB
Price
$62.85
Change
-$0.57 (-0.90%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
405.48M
COFS
Price
$30.36
Change
+$1.33 (+4.58%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
206.57M
86 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHRB vs COFS

Header iconBHRB vs COFS Comparison
Open Charts BHRB vs COFSBanner chart's image
Burke & Herbert Financial Services
Price$62.85
Change-$0.57 (-0.90%)
Volume$51.12K
Capitalization405.48M
ChoiceOne Financial Services
Price$30.36
Change+$1.33 (+4.58%)
Volume$81.71K
Capitalization206.57M
BHRB vs COFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHRB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
COFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHRB vs. COFS commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHRB is a Buy and COFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BHRB: $62.85 vs. COFS: $30.35)
Brand notoriety: BHRB and COFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHRB: 78% vs. COFS: 69%
Market capitalization -- BHRB: $405.48M vs. COFS: $206.57M
BHRB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $405.48M. COFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $206.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHRB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCOFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHRB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • COFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, COFS is a better buy in the long-term than BHRB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHRB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COFS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHRB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • COFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COFS is a better buy in the short-term than BHRB.

Price Growth

BHRB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.27% price change this week, while COFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

COFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.29% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHRB($405M) has a higher market cap than COFS($207M). BHRB has higher P/E ratio than COFS: BHRB (18.05) vs COFS (9.50). BHRB YTD gains are higher at: 2.638 vs. COFS (-13.175). COFS has more cash in the bank: 144M vs. BHRB (9.06M). COFS has less debt than BHRB: COFS (236M) vs BHRB (272M). BHRB has higher revenues than COFS: BHRB (111M) vs COFS (80.8M).
BHRBCOFSBHRB / COFS
Capitalization405M207M196%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.638-13.175-20%
P/E Ratio18.059.50190%
Revenue111M80.8M137%
Total Cash9.06M144M6%
Total Debt272M236M115%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHRB vs COFS: Fundamental Ratings
BHRB
COFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
505
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5362
SMR RATING
1..100
1747
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
979
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
39n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COFS's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as BHRB (61). This means that COFS’s stock grew similarly to BHRB’s over the last 12 months.

BHRB's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as COFS (62). This means that BHRB’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

BHRB's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as COFS (47). This means that BHRB’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

BHRB's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as COFS (51). This means that BHRB’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

COFS's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BHRB (97). This means that COFS’s stock grew significantly faster than BHRB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHRBCOFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHRB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
COFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABZPF0.85N/A
N/A
Aboitiz Power Corp.
CNGA0.07N/A
N/A
Conair Corp.
JBPHF0.29N/A
N/A
Jacobio Pharmaceuticals Group Co Ltd.
ANPCF0.11N/A
N/A
ANGLE plc
EJPRY10.74-0.06
-0.56%
East Japan Railway Co.

BHRB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHRB has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHRB jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHRB
1D Price
Change %
BHRB100%
-0.90%
ABCB - BHRB
84%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
NWBI - BHRB
84%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
STBA - BHRB
84%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
FFBC - BHRB
83%
Closely correlated
+4.28%
SRCE - BHRB
83%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
More

COFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COFS has been closely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COFS jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COFS
1D Price
Change %
COFS100%
+4.55%
EFSC - COFS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
OBK - COFS
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BHRB - COFS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
CFFN - COFS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
ONB - COFS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
More