BHPLF
Price
$25.70
Change
+$0.36 (+1.42%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
156.31B
GLNCY
Price
$8.32
Change
-$0.01 (-0.12%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
75.42B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHPLF vs GLNCY

Header iconBHPLF vs GLNCY Comparison
Open Charts BHPLF vs GLNCYBanner chart's image
BHP Group
Price$25.70
Change+$0.36 (+1.42%)
Volume$201.66K
Capitalization156.31B
Glencore
Price$8.32
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
Volume$369.12K
Capitalization75.42B
BHPLF vs GLNCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHPLF vs. GLNCY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHPLF is a Hold and GLNCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BHPLF: $25.70 vs. GLNCY: $8.32)
Brand notoriety: BHPLF and GLNCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHPLF: 47% vs. GLNCY: 40%
Market capitalization -- BHPLF: $156.31B vs. GLNCY: $75.42B
BHPLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $156.31B. GLNCY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $75.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHPLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGLNCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BHPLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GLNCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHPLF is a better buy in the long-term than GLNCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHPLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLNCY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHPLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GLNCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHPLF is a better buy in the short-term than GLNCY.

Price Growth

BHPLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +5.98% price change this week, while GLNCY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +5.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLNCY is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHPLF($156B) has a higher market cap than GLNCY($75.4B). BHPLF has higher P/E ratio than GLNCY: BHPLF (8.64) vs GLNCY (4.53). BHPLF YTD gains are higher at: 8.187 vs. GLNCY (-3.223). BHPLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.8B vs. GLNCY (31.6B). BHPLF has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. GLNCY (1.45B). BHPLF has less debt than GLNCY: BHPLF (14.7B) vs GLNCY (28.8B). GLNCY has higher revenues than BHPLF: GLNCY (256B) vs BHPLF (60.3B).
BHPLFGLNCYBHPLF / GLNCY
Capitalization156B75.4B207%
EBITDA35.8B31.6B113%
Gain YTD8.187-3.223-254%
P/E Ratio8.644.53191%
Revenue60.3B256B24%
Total Cash10.1B1.45B699%
Total Debt14.7B28.8B51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHPLF vs GLNCY: Fundamental Ratings
BHPLF
GLNCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5953
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9368
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHPLF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLNCY (94). This means that BHPLF’s stock grew significantly faster than GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

GLNCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as BHPLF (59). This means that GLNCY’s stock grew similarly to BHPLF’s over the last 12 months.

GLNCY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BHPLF (100). This means that GLNCY’s stock grew similarly to BHPLF’s over the last 12 months.

GLNCY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BHPLF (50). This means that GLNCY’s stock grew similarly to BHPLF’s over the last 12 months.

GLNCY's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as BHPLF (93). This means that GLNCY’s stock grew similarly to BHPLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHPLFGLNCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVIR3.740.11
+3.17%
Atea Pharmaceuticals
ETNB10.160.06
+0.59%
89bio
GOOGL179.530.89
+0.50%
Alphabet
NE28.400.13
+0.46%
Noble Corp
PODC2.33-0.54
-18.82%
PodcastOne

BHPLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHPLF has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BHPLF jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHPLF
1D Price
Change %
BHPLF100%
+1.40%
BHP - BHPLF
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
RIO - BHPLF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
FCX - BHPLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
FSUGY - BHPLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
GLNCY - BHPLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
More

GLNCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLNCY has been closely correlated with GLCNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLNCY jumps, then GLCNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLNCY
1D Price
Change %
GLNCY100%
-0.12%
GLCNF - GLNCY
89%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
FCX - GLNCY
76%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
RIO - GLNCY
75%
Closely correlated
-1.93%
SCCO - GLNCY
74%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
BHP - GLNCY
74%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
More