BHP
Price
$48.55
Change
-$1.26 (-2.53%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
146.11B
64 days until earnings call
RTPPF
Price
$57.90
Change
+$0.21 (+0.36%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
107.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHP vs RTPPF

Header iconBHP vs RTPPF Comparison
Open Charts BHP vs RTPPFBanner chart's image
BHP Group
Price$48.55
Change-$1.26 (-2.53%)
Volume$2.71M
Capitalization146.11B
Rio Tinto
Price$57.90
Change+$0.21 (+0.36%)
Volume$2.02K
Capitalization107.7B
BHP vs RTPPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHP vs. RTPPF commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHP is a Buy and RTPPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BHP: $48.55 vs. RTPPF: $57.90)
Brand notoriety: BHP: Notable vs. RTPPF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHP: 97% vs. RTPPF: 203%
Market capitalization -- BHP: $146.11B vs. RTPPF: $107.7B
BHP [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $146.11B. RTPPF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $107.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRTPPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RTPPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the long-term than RTPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BHP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.08% price change this week, while RTPPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHP is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.32% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHP($146B) has a higher market cap than RTPPF($108B). BHP has higher P/E ratio than RTPPF: BHP (20.02) vs RTPPF (12.42). RTPPF YTD gains are higher at: 4.311 vs. BHP (1.428). BHP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 22.6B vs. RTPPF (20.7B). BHP (10.6B) and RTPPF (10.5B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RTPPF has less debt than BHP: RTPPF (14.1B) vs BHP (22.4B). BHP has higher revenues than RTPPF: BHP (55.3B) vs RTPPF (52.4B).
BHPRTPPFBHP / RTPPF
Capitalization146B108B135%
EBITDA22.6B20.7B109%
Gain YTD1.4284.31133%
P/E Ratio20.0212.42161%
Revenue55.3B52.4B106%
Total Cash10.6B10.5B101%
Total Debt22.4B14.1B159%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHP vs RTPPF: Fundamental Ratings
BHP
RTPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4554
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7459
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9377
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RTPPF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (5) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that RTPPF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as RTPPF (54) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to RTPPF’s over the last 12 months.

RTPPF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that RTPPF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

RTPPF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (74) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that RTPPF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

RTPPF's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (93) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that RTPPF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLEIX14.180.05
+0.35%
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd Inv Shares
GQFPX12.28-0.06
-0.49%
GQG Partners Global Quality Value Fd Inv
JLVRX20.04-0.21
-1.04%
JPMorgan Large Cap Value R5
BIGIX30.04-0.37
-1.22%
William Blair International Growth I
RYAZX187.11-2.96
-1.56%
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value H

BHP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHP has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHP jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHP
1D Price
Change %
BHP100%
-2.53%
RIO - BHP
92%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
SCCO - BHP
80%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
VALE - BHP
77%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
FCX - BHP
75%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
GLNCY - BHP
74%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
More

RTPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTPPF and RIO have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTPPF and RIO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTPPF
1D Price
Change %
RTPPF100%
+0.37%
RIO - RTPPF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
MP - RTPPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.62%
FCX - RTPPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
CPPKF - RTPPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
BHP - RTPPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
More