BHP
Price
$66.02
Change
+$2.03 (+3.17%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
163.3B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PMETF
Price
$4.89
Change
+$0.10 (+2.09%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
794.52M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHP vs PMETF

Header iconBHP vs PMETF Comparison
Open Charts BHP vs PMETFBanner chart's image
BHP Group
Price$66.02
Change+$2.03 (+3.17%)
Volume$4.88M
Capitalization163.3B
PMET Resources
Price$4.89
Change+$0.10 (+2.09%)
Volume$48.58K
Capitalization794.52M
BHP vs PMETF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHP vs. PMETF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHP is a Hold and PMETF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (BHP: $66.02 vs. PMETF: $4.89)
Brand notoriety: BHP: Notable vs. PMETF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHP: 161% vs. PMETF: 91%
Market capitalization -- BHP: $163.3B vs. PMETF: $794.52M
BHP [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $163.3B. PMETF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $794.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePMETF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BHP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PMETF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the long-term than PMETF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMETF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PMETF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the short-term than PMETF.

Price Growth

BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.38% price change this week, while PMETF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +13.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +7.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +26.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHP is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+7.98% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHP($163B) has a higher market cap than PMETF($795M). PMETF has higher P/E ratio than BHP: PMETF (635.27) vs BHP (18.61). PMETF YTD gains are higher at: 25.064 vs. BHP (9.359). BHP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.8B vs. PMETF (4.63M). BHP has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. PMETF (61.2M). PMETF has less debt than BHP: PMETF (322K) vs BHP (24.5B). BHP has higher revenues than PMETF: BHP (51.3B) vs PMETF (0).
BHPPMETFBHP / PMETF
Capitalization163B795M20,503%
EBITDA25.8B4.63M556,995%
Gain YTD9.35925.06437%
P/E Ratio18.61635.273%
Revenue51.3B0-
Total Cash12B61.2M19,608%
Total Debt24.5B322K7,608,696%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHP vs PMETF: Fundamental Ratings
BHP
PMETF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1529
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4573
SMR RATING
1..100
9991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3677
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHP's Valuation (6) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for PMETF (96) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew significantly faster than PMETF’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as PMETF (73) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to PMETF’s over the last 12 months.

PMETF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (99) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that PMETF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

PMETF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (44) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that PMETF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMETF (77) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMETF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHPPMETF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PMETF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNDF47.160.50
+1.07%
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
PTIN32.890.12
+0.38%
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
KOKU122.11N/A
N/A
Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF
INVN21.47-0.18
-0.81%
Alger Russell Innovation ETF
EGUS52.42-0.90
-1.68%
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF

BHP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHP has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHP jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHP
1D Price
Change %
BHP100%
+3.17%
RIO - BHP
86%
Closely correlated
+2.74%
GLNCY - BHP
74%
Closely correlated
+3.41%
FSUGY - BHP
73%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
VALE - BHP
66%
Loosely correlated
+3.54%
GLCNF - BHP
66%
Loosely correlated
+3.01%
More

PMETF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMETF has been loosely correlated with PILBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMETF jumps, then PILBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMETF
1D Price
Change %
PMETF100%
+2.09%
PILBF - PMETF
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
LAC - PMETF
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.77%
BHP - PMETF
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.17%
RIO - PMETF
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.74%
SGML - PMETF
41%
Loosely correlated
+6.69%
More