BHP
Price
$69.67
Change
-$2.55 (-3.53%)
Updated
Feb 5, 02:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
186.84B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FMCXF
Price
$4.46
Change
-$0.12 (-2.62%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.4B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHP vs FMCXF

Header iconBHP vs FMCXF Comparison
Open Charts BHP vs FMCXFBanner chart's image
BHP Group
Price$69.67
Change-$2.55 (-3.53%)
Volume$1.47K
Capitalization186.84B
Foran Mining
Price$4.46
Change-$0.12 (-2.62%)
Volume$421.89K
Capitalization2.4B
BHP vs FMCXF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHP vs. FMCXF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHP is a Hold and FMCXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BHP: $72.22 vs. FMCXF: $4.46)
Brand notoriety: BHP: Notable vs. FMCXF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHP: 129% vs. FMCXF: 210%
Market capitalization -- BHP: $186.84B vs. FMCXF: $2.4B
BHP [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $186.84B. FMCXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFMCXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FMCXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the long-term than FMCXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMCXF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FMCXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the short-term than FMCXF.

Price Growth

BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.78% price change this week, while FMCXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -14.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -5.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +77.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHP is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-5.85% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHP($187B) has a higher market cap than FMCXF($2.4B). FMCXF YTD gains are higher at: 21.163 vs. BHP (19.629). BHP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.8B vs. FMCXF (-4.57M). BHP has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. FMCXF (333M). FMCXF has less debt than BHP: FMCXF (431M) vs BHP (24.5B). BHP has higher revenues than FMCXF: BHP (51.3B) vs FMCXF (0).
BHPFMCXFBHP / FMCXF
Capitalization187B2.4B7,792%
EBITDA25.8B-4.57M-564,428%
Gain YTD19.62921.16393%
P/E Ratio20.36N/A-
Revenue51.3B0-
Total Cash12B333M3,604%
Total Debt24.5B431M5,684%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHP vs FMCXF: Fundamental Ratings
BHP
FMCXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
658
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4417
SMR RATING
1..100
9990
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4036
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHP's Valuation (8) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as FMCXF (39) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to FMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

FMCXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (44) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FMCXF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

FMCXF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (99) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FMCXF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

FMCXF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (40) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FMCXF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMCXF (100) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew significantly faster than FMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHPFMCXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMCXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTDS62.011.45
+2.39%
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
FXU46.870.11
+0.24%
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX® ETF
ECF12.22-0.12
-0.93%
Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd
BMAX23.21-0.24
-1.00%
Rex Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF
VONG116.75-1.43
-1.21%
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF

BHP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHP has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHP jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHP
1D Price
Change %
BHP100%
-0.71%
RIO - BHP
90%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
VALE - BHP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
GLNCY - BHP
74%
Closely correlated
-4.86%
FSUGY - BHP
73%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
AOTVF - BHP
70%
Closely correlated
+9.02%
More

FMCXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMCXF has been loosely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMCXF jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMCXF
1D Price
Change %
FMCXF100%
-2.62%
TECK - FMCXF
55%
Loosely correlated
-5.64%
IVPAF - FMCXF
45%
Loosely correlated
-5.21%
SOUHY - FMCXF
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.25%
BHP - FMCXF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
RIO - FMCXF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
More