BHP
Price
$55.59
Change
-$0.69 (-1.23%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
144.07B
One day until earnings call
FMCXF
Price
$2.50
Change
-$0.08 (-3.10%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.35B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHP vs FMCXF

Header iconBHP vs FMCXF Comparison
Open Charts BHP vs FMCXFBanner chart's image
BHP Group
Price$55.59
Change-$0.69 (-1.23%)
Volume$3.34M
Capitalization144.07B
Foran Mining
Price$2.50
Change-$0.08 (-3.10%)
Volume$189.01K
Capitalization1.35B
BHP vs FMCXF Comparison Chart in %
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHP vs. FMCXF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHP is a Hold and FMCXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BHP: $55.59 vs. FMCXF: $2.50)
Brand notoriety: BHP: Notable vs. FMCXF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHP: 106% vs. FMCXF: 138%
Market capitalization -- BHP: $144.07B vs. FMCXF: $1.35B
BHP [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $144.07B. FMCXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFMCXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FMCXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the long-term than FMCXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMCXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FMCXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BHP and FMCXF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.67% price change this week, while FMCXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +253.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHP is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.05% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHP($144B) has a higher market cap than FMCXF($1.35B). BHP YTD gains are higher at: 18.699 vs. FMCXF (-8.352). BHP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.8B vs. FMCXF (6.52M). BHP has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. FMCXF (397M). FMCXF has less debt than BHP: FMCXF (410M) vs BHP (24.5B). BHP has higher revenues than FMCXF: BHP (51.3B) vs FMCXF (0).
BHPFMCXFBHP / FMCXF
Capitalization144B1.35B10,682%
EBITDA25.8B6.52M395,827%
Gain YTD18.699-8.352-224%
P/E Ratio15.67N/A-
Revenue51.3B0-
Total Cash12B397M3,023%
Total Debt24.5B410M5,976%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHP vs FMCXF: Fundamental Ratings
BHP
FMCXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6887
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4531
SMR RATING
1..100
9992
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
62100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHP's Valuation (7) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as FMCXF (35) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to FMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

FMCXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (45) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FMCXF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

FMCXF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (99) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FMCXF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

FMCXF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (48) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that FMCXF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMCXF (100) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHPFMCXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMST29.670.57
+1.94%
Bitwise MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
THQ17.890.13
+0.73%
abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund
COWZ56.690.29
+0.51%
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
MSTB40.080.07
+0.18%
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF
CVAR28.170.02
+0.08%
Cultivar ETF

BHP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHP has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHP jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHP
1D Price
Change %
BHP100%
-1.23%
RIO - BHP
86%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
VALE - BHP
75%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
GLNCY - BHP
74%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
FSUGY - BHP
73%
Closely correlated
+2.06%
GLCNF - BHP
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
More

FMCXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMCXF has been loosely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMCXF jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMCXF
1D Price
Change %
FMCXF100%
-3.17%
TECK - FMCXF
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
IVPAF - FMCXF
45%
Loosely correlated
-5.73%
SOUHY - FMCXF
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
BHP - FMCXF
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
RIO - FMCXF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
More