Advertisement
BHM vs SELF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHM is a Hold and SELF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BHM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSELF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BHM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SELF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BHM’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SELF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BHM’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SELF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BHM (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -3.12% price change this week, while SELF (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was +1.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.46%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
SELF is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (-0.35% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
@Specialty Telecommunications (-1.12% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
| BHM | SELF | BHM / SELF | |
| Capitalization | 55.2M | 58.3M | 95% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.176 | -1.093 | -382% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 23.36 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 336M | 16.2M | 2,074% |
SELF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BHM | SELF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 32% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 42% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 11 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
BHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BHM and UNIT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHM and UNIT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHM | 100% | +6.25% | ||
| UNIT - BHM | 21% Poorly correlated | -9.42% | ||
| EPRT - BHM | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
| UHT - BHM | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.79% | ||
| SELF - BHM | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.95% | ||
| CBL - BHM | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||
SELF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SELF has been loosely correlated with SILA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SELF jumps, then SILA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SELF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SELF | 100% | -2.10% | ||
| SILA - SELF | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| NTST - SELF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
| BHM - SELF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| NSA - SELF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| FRT - SELF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
More | ||||