Advertisement
BHM vs MHCUF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHM is a Buy and MHCUF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BHM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMHCUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BHM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MHCUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BHM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MHCUF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BHM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MHCUF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BHM (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -1.43% price change this week, while MHCUF (@Media Conglomerates) price change was -0.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
BHM is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (-0.22% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| BHM | MHCUF | BHM / MHCUF | |
| Capitalization | 52.1M | 369M | 14% |
| EBITDA | 34.4M | 115M | 30% |
| Gain YTD | -1.646 | 23.061 | -7% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 3.90 | - |
| Revenue | 59.7M | 96.8M | 62% |
| Total Cash | 128M | 8.37M | 1,530% |
| Total Debt | 339M | 428M | 79% |
| BHM | MHCUF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 42% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 5 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 5 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 5 days ago 39% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 5 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 69% | 19 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 5 days ago 45% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 5 days ago 42% |
Advertisement
BHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BHM and UNIT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHM and UNIT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHM | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| UNIT - BHM | 21% Poorly correlated | +12.73% | ||
| EPRT - BHM | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
| UHT - BHM | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| SELF - BHM | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.90% | ||
| CBL - BHM | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
More | ||||
MHCUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MHCUF and BSRTF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHCUF and BSRTF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MHCUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHCUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BSRTF - MHCUF | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.34% | ||
| DRREF - MHCUF | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
| BHM - MHCUF | 0% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
| MDV - MHCUF | -0% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
| PMREF - MHCUF | -5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||