BHM
Price
$13.57
Change
+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
55.16M
CBL
Price
$28.68
Change
+$0.45 (+1.59%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
873.24M
98 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHM vs CBL

Header iconBHM vs CBL Comparison
Open Charts BHM vs CBLBanner chart's image
Bluerock Homes Trust
Price$13.57
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Volume$100
Capitalization55.16M
CBL & Associates Properties
Price$28.68
Change+$0.45 (+1.59%)
Volume$726
Capitalization873.24M
BHM vs CBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHM vs. CBL commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHM is a Hold and CBL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BHM: $13.55 vs. CBL: $28.23)
Brand notoriety: BHM and CBL are both not notable
BHM represents the Media Conglomerates, while CBL is part of the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHM: 51% vs. CBL: 71%
Market capitalization -- BHM: $55.26M vs. CBL: $887.47M
BHM [@Media Conglomerates] is valued at $55.26M. CBL’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $887.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $26.35B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $5.46B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCBL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BHM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CBL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBL is a better buy in the long-term than BHM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHM’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHM’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CBL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHM is a better buy in the short-term than CBL.

Price Growth

BHM (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -3.12% price change this week, while CBL (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +6.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.46%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBL is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Media Conglomerates (-0.35% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.31% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBL($873M) has a higher market cap than BHM($55.2M). BHM YTD gains are higher at: 4.176 vs. CBL (1.802). BHM has less debt than CBL: BHM (336M) vs CBL (2.15B).
BHMCBLBHM / CBL
Capitalization55.2M873M6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.1761.802232%
P/E RatioN/A13.57-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt336M2.15B16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBL: Fundamental Ratings
CBL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHMCBL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QIMGF0.400.01
+1.80%
QUIMBAYA GOLD INC
WELPP66.870.87
+1.32%
Wisconsin Electric Power Co.
PORBF9.95N/A
N/A
Pola Orbis Holdings Inc
STBFF30.71N/A
N/A
Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd
CBTN28.75N/A
N/A
Citizens Bancorp Investment, Inc.

BHM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BHM and UNIT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHM and UNIT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHM
1D Price
Change %
BHM100%
+6.25%
UNIT - BHM
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.42%
EPRT - BHM
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
UHT - BHM
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
SELF - BHM
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
CBL - BHM
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
More

CBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBL has been closely correlated with SPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBL jumps, then SPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBL
1D Price
Change %
CBL100%
+0.39%
SPG - CBL
67%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
MAC - CBL
66%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
OUT - CBL
65%
Loosely correlated
-5.53%
FR - CBL
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
AKR - CBL
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
More