BHFAO
Price
$15.68
Change
-$0.02 (-0.13%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MET
Price
$82.16
Change
-$0.09 (-0.11%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
54.13B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHFAO vs MET

Header iconBHFAO vs MET Comparison
Open Charts BHFAO vs METBanner chart's image
Brighthouse Financial
Price$15.68
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
Volume$66.06K
CapitalizationN/A
MetLife
Price$82.16
Change-$0.09 (-0.11%)
Volume$3.38M
Capitalization54.13B
BHFAO vs MET Comparison Chart in %
BHFAO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHFAO vs. MET commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHFAO is a Buy and MET is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (BHFAO: $15.70 vs. MET: $82.25)
Brand notoriety: BHFAO: Not notable vs. MET: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHFAO: 155% vs. MET: 115%
Market capitalization -- BHFAO: $0 vs. MET: $54.13B
BHFAO [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $0. MET’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $54.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $160.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $27.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHFAO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHFAO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the long-term than BHFAO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHFAO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHFAO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the short-term than BHFAO.

Price Growth

BHFAO (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -4.56% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +5.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

MET is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.53% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET YTD gains are higher at: 3.362 vs. BHFAO (-24.532). MET has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. BHFAO (88.9B). BHFAO has less debt than MET: BHFAO (3.16B) vs MET (19.8B). MET has higher revenues than BHFAO: MET (70.8B) vs BHFAO (5.9B).
BHFAOMETBHFAO / MET
CapitalizationN/A54.1B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-24.5323.362-730%
P/E RatioN/A15.47-
Revenue5.9B70.8B8%
Total Cash88.9B115B77%
Total Debt3.16B19.8B16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MET: Fundamental Ratings
MET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
13
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHFAOMET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHFAO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSDD67.570.88
+1.32%
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF
SMCO28.000.25
+0.91%
Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF
FDV28.860.18
+0.63%
Federated Hermes US Strategic Dvd ETF
XTOC33.400.01
+0.03%
Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF™ Oct
DFEM32.88-0.10
-0.30%
Dimensional Emerging Markets Cr Eq 2 ETF

BHFAO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHFAO has been closely correlated with BHFAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHFAO jumps, then BHFAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHFAO
1D Price
Change %
BHFAO100%
-0.19%
BHFAP - BHFAO
91%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
BHFAN - BHFAO
83%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
BHFAM - BHFAO
82%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
PRI - BHFAO
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
BHF - BHFAO
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
More

MET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MET
1D Price
Change %
MET100%
+3.04%
PRU - MET
89%
Closely correlated
+2.00%
AFL - MET
86%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
LNC - MET
81%
Closely correlated
+2.75%
JXN - MET
79%
Closely correlated
+2.31%
PRI - MET
76%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
More