BHDB
Price
$84.00
Change
-$16.30 (-16.25%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MBOF
Price
$39.95
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHDB vs MBOF

Header iconBHDB vs MBOF Comparison
Open Charts BHDB vs MBOFBanner chart's image
Bank of Labor Bancshares
Price$84.00
Change-$16.30 (-16.25%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
MARINE BANCORP FLA
Price$39.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
BHDB vs MBOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHDB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHDB vs. MBOF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHDB is a Hold and MBOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BHDB: $84.00 vs. MBOF: $39.95)
Brand notoriety: BHDB and MBOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHDB: 50% vs. MBOF: 12%
Market capitalization -- BHDB: $0 vs. MBOF: $0
BHDB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. MBOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHDB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMBOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHDB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MBOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHDB is a better buy in the long-term than MBOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHDB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBOF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHDB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MBOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHDB is a better buy in the short-term than MBOF.

Price Growth

BHDB (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MBOF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHDB YTD gains are higher at: 89.189 vs. MBOF (-0.125).
BHDBMBOFBHDB / MBOF
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD89.189-0.125-71,352%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHDB: Fundamental Ratings
BHDB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
11

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHDBMBOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
8%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
5%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
15%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHDB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PATH13.290.44
+3.42%
UiPath
TNDM17.08N/A
N/A
Tandem Diabetes Care
SKYT10.88-0.07
-0.64%
SkyWater Technology
UBX0.29-0.01
-1.71%
Unity Biotechnology
BMEA1.66-0.06
-3.49%
Biomea Fusion

BHDB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BHDB and MBOF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHDB and MBOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHDB
1D Price
Change %
BHDB100%
N/A
MBOF - BHDB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYVF - BHDB
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
FFDF - BHDB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFSB - BHDB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
VBNK - BHDB
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
More

MBOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBOF has been loosely correlated with OAKV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBOF jumps, then OAKV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBOF
1D Price
Change %
MBOF100%
N/A
OAKV - MBOF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.00%
SSBP - MBOF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TFIN - MBOF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
ITCFY - MBOF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BHDB - MBOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More