BHDB
Price
$100.30
Change
+$2.30 (+2.35%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
CYVF
Price
$66.50
Change
-$0.50 (-0.75%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
85.94M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHDB vs CYVF

Header iconBHDB vs CYVF Comparison
Open Charts BHDB vs CYVFBanner chart's image
Bank of Labor Bancshares
Price$100.30
Change+$2.30 (+2.35%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Crystal Valley Financial
Price$66.50
Change-$0.50 (-0.75%)
Volume$6.1K
Capitalization85.94M
BHDB vs CYVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHDB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHDB vs. CYVF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHDB is a Hold and CYVF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BHDB: $100.30 vs. CYVF: $66.50)
Brand notoriety: BHDB and CYVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHDB: 53% vs. CYVF: 499%
Market capitalization -- BHDB: $0 vs. CYVF: $85.94M
BHDB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. CYVF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $85.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHDB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCYVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHDB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CYVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CYVF is a better buy in the long-term than BHDB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHDB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CYVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHDB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CYVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHDB is a better buy in the short-term than CYVF.

Price Growth

BHDB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +20.84% price change this week, while CYVF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHDB YTD gains are higher at: 128.623 vs. CYVF (5.452).
BHDBCYVFBHDB / CYVF
CapitalizationN/A85.9M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD128.6235.4522,359%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHDB vs CYVF: Fundamental Ratings
BHDB
CYVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10011
SMR RATING
1..100
10045
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3653
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4660
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CYVF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHDB (78). This means that CYVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHDB’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BHDB (100). This means that CYVF’s stock grew significantly faster than BHDB’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHDB (100). This means that CYVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHDB’s over the last 12 months.

BHDB's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CYVF (53). This means that BHDB’s stock grew similarly to CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

BHDB's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CYVF (60). This means that BHDB’s stock grew similarly to CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHDBCYVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
12%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHDB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BETRF0.070.01
+9.46%
BETTERLIFE PHARMA INC.
GGCCX100.190.43
+0.43%
Gabelli Growth C
AZNIX12.090.03
+0.25%
Virtus Income & Growth Inst
FAERX38.58-0.07
-0.18%
Fidelity Advisor Overseas M
YGRAF0.76-0.02
-2.19%
Yangarra Resources Ltd.

BHDB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BHDB and MBOF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHDB and MBOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHDB
1D Price
Change %
BHDB100%
N/A
MBOF - BHDB
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
CYVF - BHDB
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
FFDF - BHDB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFSB - BHDB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
VBNK - BHDB
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More

CYVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYVF and ILPMY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYVF and ILPMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYVF
1D Price
Change %
CYVF100%
-0.75%
ILPMY - CYVF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMST - CYVF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
CFBK - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
FSUN - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
SSBI - CYVF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
More