Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCUX vs FSPHX
BHCUX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCUX vs. FSPHX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCUX is a Buy and FSPHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. BHCUX (147M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than BHCUX: FSPHX (0.01) vs BHCUX (0.00). BHCUX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCUX (8 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHCUX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). BHCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCUX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCUX (5000000). BHCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.62 vs. FSPHX (-1.95). BHCUX return over 5 years is better than : 23.27 vs. FSPHX (-7.43).
| BHCUX | FSPHX | BHCUX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.63 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.63 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.717 | 13.394 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147M | 6.67B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.62 | -1.95 | -237% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.25 | 8.17 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.27 | -7.43 | -313% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement