Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCUX vs FSPHX
BHCUX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCUX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCUX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.36B vs. BHCUX (144M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than BHCUX: FSPHX (0.43) vs BHCUX (0.00). BHCUX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCUX (8 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). BHCUX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). BHCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCUX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCUX (5000000). BHCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. FSPHX (3.52). BHCUX return over 5 years is better than : 6.84 vs. FSPHX (-12.80).
| BHCUX | FSPHX | BHCUX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.63 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.63 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.141 | 1.161 | -12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 144M | 6.36B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.45 | 3.52 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.30 | 2.22 | 823% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.84 | -12.80 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers