Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCFX vs FSPHX
BHCFX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCFX vs. FSPHX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCFX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. BHCFX (146M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than BHCFX: FSPHX (0.01) vs BHCFX (0.00). BHCFX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCFX (8 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). BHCFX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). BHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCFX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCFX (2000). BHCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.59 vs. FSPHX (4.50). BHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.23 vs. FSPHX (-2.50).
| BHCFX | FSPHX | BHCFX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.63 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.63 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.374 | 13.688 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 146M | 6.67B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.59 | 4.50 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.58 | 12.88 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.23 | -2.50 | -489% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers