Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHCFX vs FSPHX
BHCFX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHCFX vs. FSPHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHCFX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. BHCFX (140M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than BHCFX: FSPHX (0.43) vs BHCFX (0.00). BHCFX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: BHCFX (8 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). BHCFX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). BHCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHCFX: FSPHX (0) vs BHCFX (2000). BHCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.89 vs. FSPHX (0.29). BHCFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.34 vs. FSPHX (-13.13).
| BHCFX | FSPHX | BHCFX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.63 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.63 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.916 | 0.809 | -237% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140M | 6.28B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.89 | 0.29 | 657% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.26 | 1.47 | 1,241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.34 | -13.13 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers