BH
Price
$311.31
Change
+$0.41 (+0.13%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
962.97M
55 days until earnings call
CMG
Price
$41.06
Change
-$0.35 (-0.85%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
55.06B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BH vs CMG

Header iconBH vs CMG Comparison
Open Charts BH vs CMGBanner chart's image
Biglari Holdings
Price$311.31
Change+$0.41 (+0.13%)
Volume$12.02K
Capitalization962.97M
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Price$41.06
Change-$0.35 (-0.85%)
Volume$22.02M
Capitalization55.06B
BH vs CMG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BH vs. CMG commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BH is a StrongBuy and CMG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BH: $311.31 vs. CMG: $41.06)
Brand notoriety: BH: Not notable vs. CMG: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BH: 54% vs. CMG: 123%
Market capitalization -- BH: $962.97M vs. CMG: $55.06B
BH [@Restaurants] is valued at $962.97M. CMG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $55.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $224.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BH is a better buy in the long-term than CMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BH’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BH’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CMG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BH is a better buy in the short-term than CMG.

Price Growth

BH (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.14% price change this week, while CMG (@Restaurants) price change was -2.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

BH is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

CMG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.38% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMG($55.1B) has a higher market cap than BH($963M). CMG has higher P/E ratio than BH: CMG (36.34) vs BH (10.76). BH YTD gains are higher at: 22.423 vs. CMG (-31.907). CMG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.35B vs. BH (98.2M). CMG has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. BH (137M). BH has less debt than CMG: BH (125M) vs CMG (4.78B). CMG has higher revenues than BH: CMG (11.6B) vs BH (377M).
BHCMGBH / CMG
Capitalization963M55.1B2%
EBITDA98.2M2.35B4%
Gain YTD22.423-31.907-70%
P/E Ratio10.7636.3430%
Revenue377M11.6B3%
Total Cash137M1.55B9%
Total Debt125M4.78B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BH vs CMG: Fundamental Ratings
BH
CMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1459
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
858
SMR RATING
1..100
7922
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4064
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1186
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BH's Valuation (53) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (84). This means that BH’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

BH's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMG (58). This means that BH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's SMR Rating (22) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BH (79). This means that CMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BH’s over the last 12 months.

BH's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (64). This means that BH’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

BH's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMG (86). This means that BH’s stock grew significantly faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHCMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSEIX16.560.15
+0.91%
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities A
CMPAX25.780.02
+0.08%
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap A
PAREX11.96N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Real Estate Advisor
MYICX9.22N/A
N/A
NYLI WMC International Research Eq Cl C
NBSLX53.18-0.34
-0.64%
Neuberger Berman Quality Equity I

BH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BH has been loosely correlated with RICK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BH jumps, then RICK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BH
1D Price
Change %
BH100%
+0.13%
RICK - BH
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
CAKE - BH
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
DIN - BH
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
CMG - BH
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
TXRH - BH
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
More

CMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMG
1D Price
Change %
CMG100%
-0.85%
SG - CMG
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.17%
WING - CMG
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
KRUS - CMG
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
SBUX - CMG
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
CAVA - CMG
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
More