BGUUF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.02 (-33.33%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
68.85M
BLAGF
Price
$0.50
Change
-$0.03 (-5.66%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
70.7M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGUUF vs BLAGF

Header iconBGUUF vs BLAGF Comparison
Open Charts BGUUF vs BLAGFBanner chart's image
Benguet Corp. BC
Price$0.04
Change-$0.02 (-33.33%)
Volume$15K
Capitalization68.85M
Blue Lagoon Resources
Price$0.50
Change-$0.03 (-5.66%)
Volume$359.29K
Capitalization70.7M
BGUUF vs BLAGF Comparison Chart in %
BGUUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BLAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGUUF vs. BLAGF commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGUUF is a Hold and BLAGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BGUUF: $0.04 vs. BLAGF: $0.50)
Brand notoriety: BGUUF and BLAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGUUF: 257% vs. BLAGF: 199%
Market capitalization -- BGUUF: $68.85M vs. BLAGF: $70.7M
BGUUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $68.85M. BLAGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $70.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $112.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGUUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBLAGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BGUUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BLAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BGUUF is a better buy in the long-term than BLAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGUUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BLAGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGUUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BLAGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLAGF is a better buy in the short-term than BGUUF.

Price Growth

BGUUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -33.33% price change this week, while BLAGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -8.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1194.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLAGF($70.7M) and BGUUF($68.8M) have the same market capitalization . BLAGF YTD gains are higher at: 389.659 vs. BGUUF (100.000). BGUUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.12B vs. BLAGF (-1.08M). BGUUF has more cash in the bank: 3.1B vs. BLAGF (284K). BGUUF has higher revenues than BLAGF: BGUUF (3.01B) vs BLAGF (0).
BGUUFBLAGFBGUUF / BLAGF
Capitalization68.8M70.7M97%
EBITDA1.12B-1.08M-104,053%
Gain YTD100.000389.65926%
P/E Ratio2.22N/A-
Revenue3.01B0-
Total Cash3.1B284K1,092,958%
Total Debt14.4MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGUUF vs BLAGF: Fundamental Ratings
BGUUF
BLAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2619
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8888
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGUUF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLAGF (74). This means that BGUUF’s stock grew significantly faster than BLAGF’s over the last 12 months.

BGUUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BLAGF (100). This means that BGUUF’s stock grew similarly to BLAGF’s over the last 12 months.

BGUUF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BLAGF (100). This means that BGUUF’s stock grew similarly to BLAGF’s over the last 12 months.

BGUUF's Price Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as BLAGF (88). This means that BGUUF’s stock grew similarly to BLAGF’s over the last 12 months.

BGUUF's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as BLAGF (100). This means that BGUUF’s stock grew similarly to BLAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGUUFBLAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BGUUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BLAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HNSPF5.000.49
+10.86%
Hansoh Pharmaceutical Group Co Ltd.
YATRY16.72N/A
N/A
Yamato Holdings Co., Ltd.
NIOVF0.02N/A
N/A
Plato Gold Corp
IQEPY2.15N/A
N/A
IQE Plc
COVCF12.70-0.30
-2.31%
COVER CORP.

BGUUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BGUUF and BRGC have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BGUUF and BRGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGUUF
1D Price
Change %
BGUUF100%
N/A
BRGC - BGUUF
7%
Poorly correlated
-10.06%
BONXF - BGUUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.71%
BLAGF - BGUUF
1%
Poorly correlated
-6.12%

BLAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLAGF and KNTNF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLAGF and KNTNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLAGF
1D Price
Change %
BLAGF100%
-6.12%
KNTNF - BLAGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-10.36%
DPMLF - BLAGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.09%
RRDMF - BLAGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.06%
BONXF - BLAGF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.71%
BGUUF - BLAGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More