BGS
Price
$6.67
Change
+$0.27 (+4.22%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
899.46M
2 days until earnings call
POST
Price
$115.66
Change
+$0.89 (+0.78%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
6.45B
67 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BGS vs POST

Header iconBGS vs POST Comparison
Open Charts BGS vs POSTBanner chart's image
B&G Foods
Price$6.67
Change+$0.27 (+4.22%)
Volume$1.98M
Capitalization899.46M
Post Holdings
Price$115.66
Change+$0.89 (+0.78%)
Volume$550.4K
Capitalization6.45B
BGS vs POST Comparison Chart
Loading...
BGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGS vs. POST commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGS is a Hold and POST is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BGS: $5.97 vs. POST: $111.48)
Brand notoriety: BGS and POST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGS: 101% vs. POST: 88%
Market capitalization -- BGS: $899.46M vs. POST: $6.45B
BGS [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $899.46M. POST’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $6.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePOST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • POST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BGS and POST are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POST’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • POST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, POST is a better buy in the short-term than BGS.

Price Growth

BGS (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while POST (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGS is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

POST is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.32% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
POST($6.45B) has a higher market cap than BGS($899M). BGS has higher P/E ratio than POST: BGS (25.71) vs POST (22.68). POST YTD gains are higher at: -2.604 vs. BGS (-13.353). POST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.13B vs. BGS (173M). POST has more cash in the bank: 151M vs. BGS (41.1M). BGS has less debt than POST: BGS (2.12B) vs POST (6.32B). POST has higher revenues than BGS: POST (7.39B) vs BGS (2.06B).
BGSPOSTBGS / POST
Capitalization899M6.45B14%
EBITDA173M1.13B15%
Gain YTD-13.353-2.604513%
P/E Ratio25.7122.68113%
Revenue2.06B7.39B28%
Total Cash41.1M151M27%
Total Debt2.12B6.32B34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGS vs POST: Fundamental Ratings
BGS
POST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5511
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10020
SMR RATING
1..100
9171
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5577
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGS's Valuation (2) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for POST (82) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew significantly faster than POST’s over the last 12 months.

POST's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for BGS (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that POST’s stock grew significantly faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.

POST's SMR Rating (71) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (91) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that POST’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

POST's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (80) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that POST’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

BGS's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as POST (77) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to POST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGSPOST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

BGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGS has been loosely correlated with BYND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGS jumps, then BYND could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGS
1D Price
Change %
BGS100%
-1.00%
BYND - BGS
45%
Loosely correlated
+11.39%
NATR - BGS
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
CENTA - BGS
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
NOMD - BGS
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
POST - BGS
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
More

POST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POST has been loosely correlated with HSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if POST jumps, then HSY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POST
1D Price
Change %
POST100%
+0.01%
HSY - POST
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.24%
MDLZ - POST
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
KHC - POST
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
CPB - POST
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
GIS - POST
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
More