BGS
Price
$4.55
Change
-$0.12 (-2.57%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
373.49M
110 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NATR
Price
$20.70
Change
+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
362.16M
125 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGS vs NATR

Header iconBGS vs NATR Comparison
Open Charts BGS vs NATRBanner chart's image
B&G Foods
Price$4.55
Change-$0.12 (-2.57%)
Volume$14.13K
Capitalization373.49M
Nature's Sunshine Products
Price$20.70
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Volume$4.04K
Capitalization362.16M
BGS vs NATR Comparison Chart in %
BGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NATR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGS vs. NATR commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGS is a Hold and NATR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BGS: $4.67 vs. NATR: $20.69)
Brand notoriety: BGS and NATR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGS: 79% vs. NATR: 287%
Market capitalization -- BGS: $363.9M vs. NATR: $362.86M
BGS [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $363.9M. NATR’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $362.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $261.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNATR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NATR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BGS is a better buy in the long-term than NATR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NATR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BGS and NATR are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BGS (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +17.34% price change this week, while NATR (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +46.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGS is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

NATR is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.95% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGS($373M) and NATR($362M) have the same market capitalization . NATR YTD gains are higher at: 41.132 vs. BGS (-23.864). NATR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 38.6M vs. BGS (-55.71M). NATR has less debt than BGS: NATR (15.6M) vs BGS (2.04B). BGS has higher revenues than NATR: BGS (1.86B) vs NATR (461M).
BGSNATRBGS / NATR
Capitalization373M362M103%
EBITDA-55.71M38.6M-144%
Gain YTD-23.86441.132-58%
P/E RatioN/A25.56-
Revenue1.86B461M404%
Total CashN/A81.3M-
Total Debt2.04B15.6M13,064%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGS vs NATR: Fundamental Ratings
BGS
NATR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7826
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10056
SMR RATING
1..100
9673
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4639
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4122
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGS's Valuation (2) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for NATR (78) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew significantly faster than NATR’s over the last 12 months.

NATR's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGS (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NATR’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.

NATR's SMR Rating (73) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (96) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NATR’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

NATR's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (46) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NATR’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

NATR's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as BGS (41) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that NATR’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGSNATR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NATR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGKKF4.40N/A
N/A
Bangkok Bank Public Co Ltd.
ACGBF0.74N/A
N/A
Agricultural Bank of China
HCTPF0.21N/A
N/A
Hutchison Port Holdings Trust
HXGCF0.67N/A
N/A
Hexagon Composites ASA
LOGN30.45N/A
N/A
Logansport Financial Corp.

BGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGS has been loosely correlated with HAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGS jumps, then HAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGS
1D Price
Change %
BGS100%
-1.27%
HAIN - BGS
63%
Loosely correlated
+11.81%
GIS - BGS
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
KHC - BGS
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
CPB - BGS
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
HSY - BGS
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.21%
More

NATR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NATR and BGS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NATR and BGS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATR
1D Price
Change %
NATR100%
+3.45%
BGS - NATR
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
LSF - NATR
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.90%
FAMI - NATR
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
USNA - NATR
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
UTZ - NATR
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
More