BGS
Price
$9.34
Change
+$0.05 (+0.54%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
39 days until earnings call
K
Price
$80.78
Change
+$0.14 (+0.17%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
33 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BGS vs K

Header iconBGS vs K Comparison
Open Charts BGS vs KBanner chart's image
B&G Foods
Price$9.34
Change+$0.05 (+0.54%)
Volume$815.39K
CapitalizationN/A
Kellanova
Price$80.78
Change+$0.14 (+0.17%)
Volume$1.33M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BGS vs K Comparison Chart
Loading...
BGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BGS vs. K commentary
Sep 29, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGS is a Hold and K is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2024
Stock price -- (BGS: $8.21 vs. K: $80.16)
Brand notoriety: BGS and K are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGS: 86% vs. K: 63%
Market capitalization -- BGS: $899.46M vs. K: $19.5B
BGS [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $899.46M. K’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $19.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $8.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileK’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • BGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • K’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, K is a better buy in the long-term than BGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while K’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • K’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BGS and K are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BGS (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -4.53% price change this week, while K (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2024.

K is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.61% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
K($19.5B) has a higher market cap than BGS($899M). BGS (25.71) and K (25.36) have similar P/E ratio . K YTD gains are higher at: 47.216 vs. BGS (-18.586). K has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. BGS (173M). K has more cash in the bank: 274M vs. BGS (41.1M). BGS has less debt than K: BGS (2.12B) vs K (6.53B). K has higher revenues than BGS: K (13.1B) vs BGS (2.06B).
BGSKBGS / K
Capitalization899M19.5B5%
EBITDA173M1.76B10%
Gain YTD-18.58647.216-39%
P/E Ratio25.7125.36101%
Revenue2.06B13.1B16%
Total Cash41.1M274M15%
Total Debt2.12B6.53B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGS vs K: Fundamental Ratings
BGS
K
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
931
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10015
SMR RATING
1..100
9239
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5830
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGS's Valuation (3) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as K (29). This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to K’s over the last 12 months.

K's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for BGS (100). This means that K’s stock grew significantly faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.

K's SMR Rating (39) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGS (92). This means that K’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.

K's Price Growth Rating (1) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for BGS (75). This means that K’s stock grew significantly faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.

K's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as BGS (58). This means that K’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend about 2 months ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.14-0.28
-1.20%
GameStop Corp
TSLA210.60-3.51
-1.64%
Tesla
SPY552.08-11.60
-2.06%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL222.77-6.23
-2.72%
Apple
BTC.X57431.023000-1681.457000
-2.84%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

BGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGS has been loosely correlated with BYND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGS jumps, then BYND could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGS
1D Price
Change %
BGS100%
-3.07%
BYND - BGS
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
K - BGS
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
CAG - BGS
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
NATR - BGS
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
CENTA - BGS
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
More

K and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, K has been loosely correlated with MDLZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if K jumps, then MDLZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To K
1D Price
Change %
K100%
+0.15%
MDLZ - K
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
MKC - K
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
INGR - K
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.01%
KHC - K
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
HSY - K
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
More